4.6 Article

Comparative genomics of the Liberibacter genus reveals widespread diversity in genomic content and positive selection history

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1206094

关键词

evolution; bacteria; pan-genome; positive selection; plant pathogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the genetic diversity of 'Candidatus Liberibacter' species was examined using comparative genomics. The analysis revealed that the 'Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum' species has the highest intraspecific diversity and the largest plant host range.
'Candidatus Liberibacter' is a group of bacterial species that are obligate intracellular plant pathogens and cause Huanglongbing disease of citrus trees and Zebra Chip in potatoes. Here, we examined the extent of intra- and interspecific genetic diversity across the genus using comparative genomics. Our approach examined a wide set of Liberibacter genome sequences including five pathogenic species and one species not known to cause disease. By performing comparative genomics analyses, we sought to understand the evolutionary history of this genus and to identify genes or genome regions that may affect pathogenicity. With a set of 52 genomes, we performed comparative genomics, measured genome rearrangement, and completed statistical tests of positive selection. We explored markers of genetic diversity across the genus, such as average nucleotide identity across the whole genome. These analyses revealed the highest intraspecific diversity amongst the 'Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum' species, which also has the largest plant host range. We identified sets of core and accessory genes across the genus and within each species and measured the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations (dN/dS) across genes. We identified ten genes with evidence of a history of positive selection in the Liberibacter genus, including genes in the Tad complex, which have been previously implicated as being highly divergent in the 'Ca. L. capsica' species based on high values of dN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据