4.6 Article

From Waste to Wealth: Novel Approach for Recovery of Metals from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Biological Waste

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c03075

关键词

spent LIB recycling; agriculturalwaste; leachingkinetic; metal leaching efficiency model; regeneratedcathode material

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used tea waste as an environmentally friendly reducing agent to extract metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. The leaching parameters were optimized to achieve high leaching efficiency, and the study also found that the reduction performance of tea waste is influenced by temperature and composition.
This study used tea waste (TW) as an environmentally friendly reducing agent to extract spent lithium-ion batteries in the H2SO4 solvent, thereby replacing highly explosive H2O2. The leaching parameters, including TW dosage, leaching temperature, H2SO4 concentration, leaching time, liquid-solid ratio, and stirring speed, were systematically optimized to achieve over 98% leaching efficiency of Ni, Mn, Co, and Li from the spent cathode material. The leaching kinetics study indicated that the H2SO4-TW leaching process was influenced by internal diffusion. The Box-Behnken experimental design was employed to optimize the leaching results, a proposition was made for a model that predicts the efficiencies of metal leaching. The regenerated cathode material demonstrated exceptional electrochemical performance. Contrary to the traditional biomass-reducing agents, the reduction performance of TW at low temperatures is derived from the catechins; meanwhile, at high temperatures, it is derived from the decomposition of cellulose. The oxidation process of catechins involves the oxidation of hydroxyl groups to carboxyl groups or the generation of adjacent quinone structures that form gallic acid derivatives. Using TW to extract metals from spent LIBs is an efficient, environmentally friendly, and sustainable approach to reducing the environmental impact of both waste sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据