4.6 Article

Adding Speed to Lignin Analysis Straight from Black Liquors

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c03616

关键词

lignin; size-exclusion chromatography; kraftlignin; calibration; quantification; molarmass; biorefinery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a novel method for the direct analysis of diluted black liquor by size-exclusion chromatography, enabling simultaneous determination of lignin content and molar mass while avoiding tedious sample preparation. The method significantly reduces analysis time and provides an authentic molar mass distribution of lignin. The analytical system shows excellent column stability and is suitable for high-throughput characterization of complex lignin samples.
The isolation of lignin from black liquor (BL) is a major bottleneck for high-throughput analysis of the lignin content and molar mass. Here, we introduce a novel method for the direct analysis of diluted BL by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), which allows for the simultaneous determination of lignin content and molar mass while avoiding tedious sample preparation. In this way, total analysis time was significantly reduced from 1-2 days down to only 30 min. Lignin quantification used UV detection at 410 or 475 nm for hardwood and softwood kraft lignins, respectively. Molar mass determination was based on conventional calibration corrected by MALLS(785 nm) measurements. The direct analysis provided a more authentic molar mass distribution of the lignin present in BL than analysis after conventional workup procedures-showing that lignin isolation leads to a substantial loss of low molar mass fractions. Despite the many impurities contained in BL, the presented analytical system showed excellent column stability, even after more than 250 injections. Here, we introduce a fast and efficient method for high-throughput characterization of complex lignin samples needed for close-to-real-time process control in industry and academia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据