4.7 Article

Dual-View Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via Spatial Consistency and Spectral Unmixing

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 15, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15133330

关键词

hyperspectral images; anomaly detection; spatial consistency; spectral unmixing; manifold constraint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a dual-view hyperspectral anomaly detection method that considers anomaly analysis at both pixel and subpixel levels. The spectral angular distance is used at the pixel level to calculate similarities for spatial consistency analysis, while the difference between anomaly and background at the subpixel level is analyzed through unmixing. The detection results from both levels are fused to obtain the anomalies.
Anomaly detection is a crucial task for hyperspectral image processing. Most popular methods detect anomalies at the pixel level, while a few algorithms for anomaly detection only utilize subpixel level unmixing technology to extract features without fundamentally analyzing the anomalies. To better detect and separate the anomalies from the background, this paper proposes a dual-view hyperspectral anomaly detection method by taking account of the anomaly analysis at both levels mentioned. At the pixel level, the spectral angular distance is adopted to calculate the similarities between the central pixel and its neighbors in order to further mine the spatial consistency for anomaly detection. On the other hand, from the aspect of the subpixel level analysis, it is considered that the difference between the anomaly and the background usually arises from dissimilar endmembers, where the unmixing will be fully implemented. Finally, the detection results of both views are fused to obtain the anomalies. Overall, the proposed algorithm not only interprets and analyzes the anomalies from dual levels, but also fully employs the unmixing for anomaly detection. Additionally, the performance of multiple data sets also confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据