4.7 Article

Ni(II) and Pb(II) Removal Using Bacterial Cellulose Membranes

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15183684

关键词

heavy metal adsorption; nanocellulose; bacterial cellulose; surface crystallization; kinetic modelling; isotherm; adsorption crystallization mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the synthesis and characterization of BC membranes, and their application to remove Ni(II) and Pb(II) from wastewater. It was found that BC membranes have excellent adsorption properties for both metals, with Ni(II) removal mechanism involving crystallization and Pb(II) removal being driven by the adsorption process.
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a highly crystalline nanosized material with a high number of active groups. This study focuses on the synthesis of BC membranes through fermentation, their characterization and application to remove Ni(II) and Pb(II) from wastewater by adsorption under different conditions. Four-day-grown BC membranes form three-dimensional nanofibril networks with a pH of 6.3 and a high cationic demand (52.5 & mu;eq & BULL;g-1). The pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Sips isotherm model best describe the adsorption of both metals. The intraparticle diffusion model of Ni(II) revealed a three-step mechanism of adsorption-plateau-adsorption, while Pb(II) adsorption followed a typical reducing-slope trend up to saturation. The highest removal of Ni(II) and Pb(II) was obtained at pH 4 with a BC dosage of 400 mg & BULL;L-1. The maximum adsorption capacities were 28.18 mg & BULL;g-1 and 8.49 mg & BULL;g-1 for Ni(II) and Pb(II), respectively, involving the total coverage of the material active sites. Thermodynamically, Ni(II) adsorption was exothermic, and Pb(II) was endothermic. The obtained values of sorption heat, activation and Gibbs' energy depicted a physisorption process. Ni(II) removal mechanism was ruled by crystallization on the metals adsorbed on the BC active groups, while Pb(II) was driven by the adsorption process, as shown by TEM images of the spent material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据