4.7 Article

Adsorption and Recognition Property of Tyrosine Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Prepared via Electron Beam Irradiation

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 15, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym15204048

关键词

molecularly imprinted polymer; electron beam; L-tyrosine; adsorption; recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron beam irradiation polymerization was used to fabricate L-Tyr molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for selective separation of L-Tyr. The adsorption capacity of L-Tyr and the thermodynamic behavior were investigated by controlling the absorbed dosage and temperature. The obtained MIPs showed high adsorption capacity and selectivity.
To realize the selective separation of L-tyrosine (L-Tyr) and avoid the drawbacks of traditional thermal polymerization, electron beam irradiation polymerization was developed for the fabrication of L-Tyr molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs). Firstly, L-Tyr MIPs were prepared with methacrylic acid and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and without an initiator. Then, the influence of absorbed dosage and temperature on the adsorption capacity of L-Tyr, as well as the thermodynamic behavior, were investigated. The maximum adsorption capacity of 10.96 mg/g for MIPs was obtained with an irradiation dosage of 340 kGy under 15 degrees C, and the Delta H-0 and Delta S-0 of the adsorption process are -99.79 kJ/mol and -0.31 kJ/mol.K, respectively. In addition, the effect of adsorption time on adsorption performance was evaluated under different initial concentrations, and the kinetic behavior was fitted with four different models. Finally, the recognition property of the obtained MIPs was investigated with L-Tyr and two analogues. The obtained MIPs have an imprinting factor of 5.1 and relatively high selective coefficients of 3.9 and 3.5 against L-tryptophan and L-phenylalanine, respectively. This work not only provided an L-Tyr MIP with high adsorption capacity and selectivity but also provided an effective and clean method for the synthesis of MIPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据