相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews
Tirthankar Ghosal et al.
PLOS ONE (2022)
A method for the madness: An international survey of health professions education authors' journal choice
Eliot L. Rees et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION (2022)
Politics as Usual? Measuring Populism, Nationalism, and Authoritarianism in US Presidential Campaigns (1952-2020) with Neural Language Models
Bart Bonikowski et al.
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH (2022)
Analyzing sentiments in peer review reports: Evidence from two science funding agencies
Junwen Luo et al.
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES (2022)
Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal
Jakub Olczak et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2021)
Equity and the JAMA Network
Phil B. Fontanarosa et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2021)
Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
Anna Severin et al.
BMJ OPEN (2021)
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Anna Severin et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2021)
Unlock ways to share data on peer review
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
NATURE (2020)
Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
Dietmar Wolfram et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2020)
COVID-19 RETRACTIONS RAISE CONCERNS ABOUT DATA OVERSIGHT
Heidi Ledford et al.
NATURE (2020)
Automatically detecting open academic review praise and criticism
Mike Thelwall et al.
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW (2020)
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
Cecilia Superchi et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis
Michaela Strinzel et al.
MBIO (2019)
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
Erin C. Mckiernan et al.
ELIFE (2019)
The Lancet Group's commitments to gender equity and diversity
LANCET (2019)
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence
Agnes Grudniewicz et al.
NATURE (2019)
glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling
Mollie E. Brooks et al.
R JOURNAL (2017)
Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use-a literature review
Sarah de Rijcke et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2016)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Douglas Bates et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2015)
Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Longitudinal Trends in the Performance of Scientific Peer Reviewers
Michael Callaham et al.
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE (2011)
Author perceptions of journal quality
John J. Regazzi et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2008)
A multilevel cross-classified modelling approach to peer review of grant proposals: the effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings
UW Jayasinghe et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2003)