4.5 Review

Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Orthopedics

Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study

Xinle Huang et al.

Summary: This study compared the surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcomes of bilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (BE-LIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). The results showed that BE-LIF had better outcomes in terms of surgical trauma, early lower back pain, total and hidden blood loss, and recovery time. However, both methods had similar medium and short-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, BE-LIF is a suitable option for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2023)

Article Clinical Neurology

Clinical Efficacy of Bilateral Decompression Using Biportal Endoscopic Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Xin Song et al.

Summary: The study compared unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in terms of surgical trauma and short-to-medium-term postoperative results. The ULIF group had significantly lower levels of C-reactive protein and decreased intraoperative and postoperative blood loss compared to the MIS-TLIF group. Both groups showed significant improvement in pain and functional scores after surgery, and the ULIF group had lower scores at the two-week postoperative follow-up. The excellent and good rates according to the Macnab criteria were not significantly different between the two groups at the last follow-up.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2023)

Article Surgery

The Learning Curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) Spinal Surgery by CUSUM Analysis

Lei Chen et al.

Summary: This study assessed the learning curve of the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique for treating single-level lumbar disc herniation. A total of 97 patients were analyzed, with a conclusion that about 24 cases of UBE operation are needed to master the technique.

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bilateral Facetectomies

Hai Le et al.

Summary: The study compared outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with bilateral facetectomies in age- and sex-matched cohort. The MIS-TLIF group had reduced estimated blood loss and lack of subfascial drain use, but longer operative time compared to the open-TLIF group. Both groups showed improvements in Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index, with MIS-TLIF providing slightly better restoration of lumbar lordosis.

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Review Clinical Neurology

Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies

Bin Meng et al.

Summary: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an effective treatment for low back pain caused by lumbar instability and deformity. Recent studies have focused on different surgical techniques and bone healing strategies, with advancements in transforaminal LIF approach and minimally invasive procedures. Non-union rates after LIF procedures remain a challenge, but efforts are being made to improve surgical outcomes by enhancing fusion cage materials and developing new osteobiologic products.

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique

Min-Seok Kang et al.

Summary: The study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of BE-TLIF and MT-TLIF in patients with single- or two-segment lumbar spinal stenosis. The results showed that both surgical techniques provided equivalent and favorable clinical outcomes and fusion rates.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Review Clinical Neurology

Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis

Johan L. Heemskerk et al.

Summary: After analyzing 16 studies, it was found that MIS-TLIF and open-TLIF have comparable long-term clinical outcomes. Both surgeries significantly reduce pain and improve PROMs, with no significant differences between the two treatments at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

SPINE JOURNAL (2021)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Learning Curve and Clinical Outcome of Biportal Endoscopic-Assisted Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Ju-Eun Kim et al.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion

Chi Heon Kim et al.

GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2020)

Article Orthopedics

Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis

Tian Gao et al.

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2017)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Review of the Technique, Indications and Graft Materials

Y-X Xiao et al.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH (2009)