4.7 Article

Pharmacological and toxicological assessment of innovative self-assembled polymeric micelles as powders for insulin pulmonary delivery

期刊

NANOMEDICINE
卷 11, 期 17, 页码 2305-2317

出版社

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0045

关键词

fine particle fraction; inhalation; insulin; in vivo; pharmacological availability; polymeric micelles; pulmonary toxicity

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal (FCT) [SFRH/BD/73062/2010]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  3. Portuguese funds through FCT [PEst-C/SAU/LA0002/2013]
  4. North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON. 2 - O Novo Norte) under National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/73062/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Explore the use of polymeric micelles in the development of powders intended for pulmonary delivery of biopharmaceuticals, using insulin as a model protein. Materials & methods: Formulations were assessed in vitro for aerosolization properties and in vivo for efficacy and safety using a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model. Results: Powders presented good aerosolization properties like fine particle fraction superior to 40% and a mass median aerodynamic diameter inferior of 6 mu m. Endotracheally instilled powders have shown a faster onset of action than subcutaneous administration of insulin at a dose of 10 IU/kg, with pharmacological availabilities up to 32.5% of those achieved by subcutaneous route. Additionally, micelles improved the hypoglycemic effect of insulin. Bronchoalveolar lavage screening for toxicity markers (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase, cytokines) revealed no signs of lung inflammation and cytotoxicity 14 days postadministration. Conclusion: Developed powders showed promising safety and efficacy characteristics for the systemic delivery of insulin by pulmonary administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据