4.7 Article

Data-Driven State Transition Algorithm for Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Dynamic Optimization

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3186475

关键词

Optimization; Heuristic algorithms; Uncertainty; Mathematical models; Dynamic programming; Programming; Production; Dynamic optimization; fuzzy chance-constrained optimization; fuzzy uncertainty; state transition algorithm (STA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a fuzzy chance-constrained dynamic optimization method for modeling uncertain and dynamic industrial production processes. Using credibility theory to quantify the fuzzy uncertainty level of constraints, an improved fuzzy simulation technique and a data-driven state transition algorithm based on deep neural networks are proposed to solve the FCCDO problem, achieving stable, global, and robust optimization performance.
Many actual industrial production processes are dynamic and uncertain. When uncertain information are described by subjective experience and experts' knowledge based on scanty or vague information, fuzzy uncertainty exists. Fuzzy chance-constrained dynamic programming are applicable to industrial production modeling accompanied by fuzzy uncertainty and dynamics, where constraints need not or cannot be completely satisfied. In this article, a fuzzy chance-constrained dynamic optimization (FCCDO) formulation on the basis of credibility theory is established, in which, the credibility is used to measure the fuzzy uncertainty level of constraints. To solve the FCCDO problem (FCCDOP), an improved fuzzy simulation technique based on Hammersley sequence sampling is raised to transform fuzzy chance constraints to their deterministic equivalents, and then a data-driven state transition algorithm (DDSTA) using deep neural networks (DNNs) is put forward to achieve a stable, global and robust optimization performance. Finally, the successful applications of the FCCDO method to industrial studies demonstrate its advantages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据