4.5 Letter

Questionable robustness in the findings of a meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2253959

关键词

Meta-analysis; all-cause mortality; cardiac-related mortality; COVID vaccines; COVID-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a meta-analysis on the effects of COVID vaccines, finding no association with all-cause mortality but an increase in cardiac-related mortality. The reliance on a non-peer-reviewed study and lack of sensitivity analyses raise concerns and warrant careful consideration.
Marchand and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis examining COVID vaccine effects on all-cause and cardiac-related mortality. Findings aligned with previous research, showing no association with all-cause mortality. However, cardiac-related mortality exhibited a 6% increase post-vaccination. Concerns arise from reliance on a non-peer-reviewed study (Ladapo, 2022) influencing results significantly. Sensitivity analyses were lacking, undermining result robustness, particularly in gender-specific outcomes. Adherence to PRISMA guidelines for transparency and thoroughness could strengthen conclusions. This study underscores vaccine safety scrutiny, yet the influence of biased sources and absence of sensitivity testing warrant careful consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据