4.5 Article

Surface spectral irradiance and irradiance partitioning in a complex mountain environment: understanding location-dependent topographic effects in satellite imagery

期刊

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2023.2264275

关键词

Adjacent-terrain irradiance; anisotropic-reflectance correction; atmosphere-topography-landcover coupling; radiation-transfer cascade; surface irradiance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remote sensing of mountain environments is challenging due to complex atmosphere-topography-landcover interactions. This study evaluates the topographic effects and identifies discrepancies in commonly used parameterization schemes, providing new insights into the modulation of radiation transfer in complex terrain.
Remote sensing of mountain environments is extremely difficult due to atmosphere-topography-landcover couplings that govern the irradiant fluxes. Researchers have not adequately accounted for topographic effects in terms of irradiance components over the landscape. Consequently, we evaluated surface spectral-irradiance components and irradiance partitioning with respect to anisotropic-reflectance correction (ARC). Our work focuses on addressing issues of scale, parameter sensitivity analysis and irradiance partitioning to provide new insights into understanding the complex nature of topographic modulation of the radiation-transfer cascade. We accomplish this by characterizing irradiance components in numerical simulations that account for topographic effects and couplings. Our results reveal atmosphere-topographic couplings associated with irradiance components that are not spatially coincident. Furthermore, we found that commonly utilized adjacent-terrain irradiance parameterization schemes produce different results compared to a more comprehensive parameterization scheme. Parameter sensitivity analysis revealed that the exclusion of topographic effects also produces different results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据