4.7 Article

Antifreeze Evaluation of Two Dehydrin Proteins from Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr

期刊

FORESTS
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f14081632

关键词

dehydrin; prokaryotic expression; thermal hysteresis; pine trees; antifreeze

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PmCAP and LpCAP are two low-temperature-induced dehydrin-like genes from the pine species Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr. The proteins encoded by these genes have antifreeze characteristics and are well adapted to the environmental conditions of pine growth. Among them, LpCAP may be a better gene resource for molecular breeding of plant cold resistance.
Dehydrins exist widely in plants and play an important role in abiotic stress resistance. Two low-temperature-induced dehydrin-like genes, PmCAP and LpCAP, from the pine species Pseudotsuga menziesii and Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr were cloned and found to contain 576 bp and 687 bp, encoding 191 and 228 amino acids, respectively. Both genes were individually assembled into prokaryotic expression vectors and transferred into E. coli cells. When transgenic stains were cultured at -5 degrees C, the lethal time 50% (LT50) was 50 h and 54 h for PmCAP and LpCAP, respectively, compared with 32 h for the control. When cultured at 20 degrees C, the LT50 was 38 h, 41 h, and 25 h for PmCAP, LpCAP, and the control. Thermal hysteresis (TH) testing of PmCAP and LpCAP proteins revealed TH values of 0.27 degrees C and 0.72 degrees C, respectively, relative to 0.05 degrees C for the BSA control. These results indicate that the two pine dehydrin proteins have antifreeze characteristics and that their antifreeze levels were well in relation to the environmental conditions of pine growth (Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr mostly grows in cold and high-altitude zones, while Pseudotsuga menziesii grows in temperate and low-altitude zones). LpCAP, especially, could be a better gene resource for the molecular breeding of plant cold resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据