4.3 Article

Estimation of the occurrence, severity, and volume of heartwood rot using airborne laser scanning and optical satellite data

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2023.2229501

关键词

Remote sensing; multi-temporal remote sensing; heartwood rot; Norway spruce

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study applied area-based approaches to predict rot occurrence, rot severity, and rot volume. Random Forest models were built and validated using remotely sensed data and ground reference data. The results showed that rot volume models performed better due to the correlation between timber volume and rot volume.
Rot in commercial timber reduces the value of the wood substantially and estimating the occurrence, severity, and volume of heartwood rot would be a useful tool in decision-making to minimize economic losses. Remotely sensed data has recently been used for mapping rot on a single-tree level, and although the results have been relatively poor, some potential has been shown. This study applied area-based approaches to predict rot occurrence, rot severity, and rot volume , at an area level. Ground reference data were collected from harvester operations in 2019-2021. Predictor variables were calculated from multi-temporal remotely sensed data together with environmental variables. Response variables from the harvester data and predictor variables from remotely sensed data were aggregated to grid cells and to forest stands. Random Forest models were built for the different combinations of response variables and predictor subsets, and validated with both random- and spatial cross-validation. The results showed that it was not possible to estimate rot occurrence and rot severity with the applied modeling procedure (pR(2): 0.00-0.16), without spatially close training data. The better performance of rot volume models (pR(2): 0.12-0.37) was mainly due to the correlation between timber volume and rot volume.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据