4.5 Article

Clinical impact of OCT-derived suboptimal stent implantation parameters and definitions

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead172

关键词

optical coherence tomography; drug-eluting stent; clinical research; risk stratification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no consensus on the optimal stent implantation parameters that enhance clinical outcome during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance. This study retrospectively examined the predictive accuracy of different suboptimal stent implantation definitions for long-term risk of device-oriented cardiovascular events (DoCE). The results showed that the definitions proposed by CLI-OPCI II and ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI studies were predictive of DoCE, while the FORZA trial definition was not.
Aims Despite growing evidence supporting the clinical utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), there is no common agreement as to the optimal stent implantation parameters that enhance clinical outcome. Methods and results We retrospectively examined the predictive accuracy of suboptimal stent implantation definitions proposed from the CLI-OPCI II, ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI, and FORZA studies for the long-term risk of device-oriented cardiovascular events (DoCE) in the population of large all-comers CLI-OPCI project. A total of 1020 patients undergoing OCT-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in the CLI-OPCI registry with a median follow-up of 809 (quartiles 414-1376) days constituted the study population. According to CLI-OPCI II, ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI, and FORZA criteria, the incidence of suboptimal stent implantation was 31.8%, 58.1%, and 57.8%, respectively. By multivariable Cox analysis, suboptimal stent implantation criteria from the CLI-OPCI II [hazard ratio 2.75 (95% confidence interval 1.88-4.02), P < 0.001] and ILUMIEN-IV OPTIMAL PCI [1.79 (1.18-2.71), P = 0.006] studies, but not FORZA trial [1.11 (0.75-1.63), P = 0.597], were predictive of DoCE. At long-term follow-up, stent edge disease with minimum lumen area <4.5 mm(2) [8.17 (5.32-12.53), P < 0.001], stent edge dissection [2.38 (1.33-4.27), P = 0.004], and minimum stent area <4.5 mm(2) [1.68 (1.13-2.51), P = 0.011] were the main OCT predictors of DoCE. Conclusion The clinical utility of OCT-guided PCI might depend on the metrics adopted to define suboptimal stent implantation. Uncovered disease at the stent border, stent edge dissection, and minimum stent area <4.5 mm(2) were the strongest OCT associates of stent failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据