4.5 Article

Estimating effective survey duration in camera trap distance sampling surveys

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Ecology

Reducing bias in density estimates for unmarked populations that exhibit reactive behaviour towards camera traps

Zackary J. Delisle et al.

Summary: Density estimates for wildlife management can be biased by animals' reactions to camera traps. This study tested different methods to reduce bias in density estimates and found that the random encounter model and camera trap distance sampling provided reliable estimates when animals did not exhibit reactive behavior. However, when animals potentially reacted to camera traps, a corrective strategy was necessary to improve the accuracy of density estimates.

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2023)

Article Zoology

Towards a best-practices guide for camera trapping: assessing differences among camera trap models and settings under field conditions

P. Palencia et al.

Summary: Camera trapping is a widely used tool in wildlife research and conservation, with different makes and models emerging. This study compared five frequently used camera trap makes to identify key factors affecting detection probability and trigger speed, highlighting the importance of caution in comparing results from different experiments. The results show differences in performance among camera trap models and settings, emphasizing the relevance of field experiments for testing their performance.

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY (2022)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

A quantitative global review of species population monitoring

Caroline Moussy et al.

Summary: Species monitoring is crucial for conservation practice and policy. Since 2000, there has been a significant increase in new monitoring schemes in lower- and middle-income countries and in megadiverse countries. The total number of monitoring schemes in a country is strongly positively correlated with its per capita GDP, and monitoring schemes in high-income countries have been running for a longer average time.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2022)

Article Ecology

Population assessment without individual identification using camera-traps: A comparison of four methods

Giacomo Santini et al.

Summary: The study investigates statistical models for estimating population size using camera traps when animals cannot be individually recognized. It finds that under ideal conditions, reliable population estimates can be obtained, but when animals' movement speeds differ, none of the models provide unbiased and precise density estimates. The models are highly sensitive to the method used for estimating the camera traps' field of view range and biases in estimating animal speeds. The study provides guidelines for wildlife managers and practitioners on how to use these statistical models for population size estimates.

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY (2022)

Article Ecology

Deer Behavior Affects Density Estimates With Camera Traps, but Is Outweighed by Spatial Variability

Maik Henrich et al.

Summary: Density is an important trait in ecological research and wildlife conservation. We examined how population density estimates can be improved by adjusting model parameters and accounting for variation in animal behavior using camera trapping data.

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2022)

Article Ecology

Camera trap distance sampling for terrestrial mammal population monitoring: lessons learnt from a UK case study

Samantha S. Mason et al.

Summary: Accurate and precise density estimates are crucial for effective species management and conservation. Camera trap distance sampling (CTDS) has been used successfully to estimate densities of multiple species in relatively homogeneous landscapes. In this study, CTDS was used in a diverse habitat area in the United Kingdom, resulting in density estimates that largely fell within previously published ranges and were among the most precise produced for these species to date. Although species-specific decisions are still required, CTDS shows potential for national-scale use.

REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION (2022)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Abundance estimation of unmarked animals based on camera-trap data

Neil A. Gilbert et al.

Summary: The rapid improvement of camera traps has revolutionized biodiversity monitoring in recent decades. Despite clear applications in conservation science, camera traps have seldom been used to model the abundance of unmarked animal populations. The challenges of estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations persist, and while multiple methods exist, no one method is optimal for camera-trap data under all circumstances.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Ecology

Estimating Abundance of an Unmarked, Low-Density Species using Cameras

Kenneth E. Loonam et al.

Summary: Estimating wildlife populations, especially for low-density and hard-to-detect species like cougars, can be challenging and costly. Remote cameras are efficient monitoring tools but traditional abundance estimation methods require identifiable individuals. New methods using encounter rates with remote cameras can estimate abundance without the need for individual identification. Time-to-event estimates were more precise and consistent compared to existing methods, while space-to-event estimates were less precise and consistent. Camera-based estimators can perform comparably to existing methods for estimating abundance in unmarked species living at low densities, allowing for broader spatial and temporal monitoring.

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2021)

Article Ecology

Estimating animal abundance and effort-precision relationship with camera trap distance sampling

Noemie Cappele et al.

Summary: Camera trap distance sampling (CTDS) has been assessed for its efficiency in estimating species abundance. The study found that for ground-dwelling species, a coefficient of variation (CV) between 10% and 20% can be achieved through various survey designs. Estimates for western chimpanzees and Maxwell's duiker density were relatively accurate, while abundance estimates for rare forest elephants were potentially unreliable due to imprecision.

ECOSPHERE (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Assessing the camera trap methodologies used to estimate density of unmarked populations

Pablo Palencia et al.

Summary: Population density estimations are crucial for wildlife management and conservation. In this study, three methods based on camera traps were compared for estimating population density without individual recognition. The results showed that each method has unique strengths and weaknesses, with Random Encounter and Staying Time (REST) being recommended for high abundance scenarios, Distance Sampling with camera traps (CT-DS) for low abundance scenarios, and Random Encounter Model (REM) for situations where camera trap performance is suboptimal. This broadens the applicability of camera trapping for estimating densities of unmarked populations.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Using distance sampling with camera traps to estimate the density of group-living and solitary mountain ungulates

Ranjana Pal et al.

Summary: This study utilized camera traps to estimate the population density of Himalayan blue sheep and Himalayan musk deer, revealing significant variability in their densities during summer and winter, which may be attributed to the topography of the landscape and the biology of the species.
Article Ecology

Random encounter model to estimate density of mountain-dwelling ungulate

Kresimir Kavcic et al.

Summary: The study tested the Random Encounter Model (REM) method for estimating the density of Balkan chamois in a Mediterranean habitat, and found comparable results to visual counts. REM showed potential for estimating density of mountain ungulates in areas where other approaches are inadequate.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Landscape-scale estimation of forest ungulate density and biomass using camera traps: Applying the REST model

Yoshihiro Nakashima et al.

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2020)

Article Biology

Statistical Development of Animal Density Estimation Using Random Encounter Modelling

N. O. A. S. Jourdain et al.

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera trap distance sampling

Mattia Bessone et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2020)

Article Ecology

Random Encounter and Staying Time Model Testing with Human Volunteers

Laura Garland et al.

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Accurate population estimation of Caprinae using camera traps and distance sampling

Grant M. Harris et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)

Article Zoology

Validating camera trap distance sampling for chimpanzees

Noemie Cappelle et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY (2019)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Estimating animal density without individual recognition using information derivable exclusively from camera traps

Yoshihiro Nakashima et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2018)

Article Ecology

Distance sampling with camera traps

Eric J. Howe et al.

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2017)

Article Ecology

How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions

Dustin J. Welbourne et al.

REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION (2016)

Article Ecology

Wildlife speed cameras: measuring animal travel speed and day range using camera traps

J. Marcus Rowcliffe et al.

REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION (2016)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes

A. Cole Burton et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2015)

Article Statistics & Probability

SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELS FOR INFERENCE ABOUT DENSITY IN UNMARKED OR PARTIALLY MARKED POPULATIONS

Richard B. Chandler et al.

ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS (2013)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition

J. Marcus Rowcliffe et al.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2008)

Review Ecology

Monitoring for conservation

James D. Nichols et al.

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2006)