4.6 Article

Metabolic characterization and modeling of fermentation process of an engineered Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius strain for bioethanol production with gas stripping

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 138-149

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.004

关键词

Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius; Bioethanol; Fermentation; Metabolism; Dynamic modeling; Optimization

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/100534X/2]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I00534X/1, BB/I00534X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/I00534X/1, BB/I00534X/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently engineered Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius strain is an industrially potent thermophilic ethanologen. We employ a systematic approach to improve our understanding of the fermentation process using cellobiose as the substrate. Dynamic metabolic flux analysis clearly shows that the fluxes from pyruvate to lactate and formate are both strictly constrained throughout the process and that both the maximum ethanol yield (0.46C/C) and the maximum specific productivity (19.8 mmol C (g DCW)(-1) h(-1)) occur at late-exponential growth phase. Accordingly, extreme pathway analysis reduces the metabolic network into a macro reaction scheme, on which a dynamic metabolic model is built. The model is validated with experimental data, parameters are identified with confidence intervals, and global sensitivity analysis (Sobol method) is performed. Model-based optimization predicts that ethanol productivity could increase from 34.2 in a typical batch process to 55.3 mmol L-1 h(-1) in an optimum Fed-batch process with higher ethanol yield. Furthermore, the optimal operating regime was identified to be continuous fermentation process with gas stripping, in which a high ethanol productivity of 113 mmol L-1 h(-1), i.e., 26.8 mmol C (g DCW)(-1) h(-1), corresponding to 90.2% of the maximum theoretical ethanol yield could be achieved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据