4.8 Article

One-Dimensional RuO2/Mn2O3 Hollow Architectures as Efficient Bifunctional Catalysts for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 2076-2083

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00185

关键词

Bifunctional; electrocatalysts; manganese oxide; ruthenium oxide; lithium-oxygen batteries; electrospinning

资金

  1. Korea CCS R&D Center (KCRC) - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2014M1A8A1049303]
  2. Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2015H1A2A1033952]
  3. End-Run grant from KAIST - Korea government (Ministry of Science ICT & Future Planning) [N01150615]
  4. Hyundai Motor Company
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [N01150615] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014M1A8A1049303, 2015H1A2A1033952] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rational design and massive production of bifunctional catalysts with fast oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) kinetics are critical to the realization of highly efficient lithium-oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries. Here, we first exploit two types of double-walled RuO2 and Mn2O3 composite fibers, i.e., (i) phase separated RuO2/Mn2O3 fiber-in-tube (RM-FIT) and (ii) multicomposite RuO2/Mn2O3 tube-in-tube (RM-TIT), by controlling ramping rate during electrospinning process. Both RM-FIT and RM-TIT exhibited excellent bifunctional electrocatalytic activities in alkaline media. The air electrodes using RM-FIT and RM-TIT showed enhanced overpotential characteristics and stable cyclability over 100 cycles in the Li-O-2 cells, demonstrating high potential as efficient OER and ORR catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据