4.5 Article

Clinical impact of the accelerate PhenoTest & REG; BC system on patients with gram-negative bacteremia and high risk of antimicrobial resistance: a prospective before-after implementation study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12941-023-00619-6

关键词

Antimicrobial treatment; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Rapid identification; Rapid AST; Antibiotic stewardship; Gram negative bacteremia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing on the treatment of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. The implementation of this testing resulted in a 20.4-hour shorter time to the appropriate antimicrobial treatment, but also raised concerns about higher costs and the potential harm from mis-identification of polymicrobial bacteremias.
BackgroundThe Accelerate PhenoTest & REG; BC system (AXDX) is a novel assay for rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). We report an evaluation of its impact on treatment of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) with a high risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).MethodsA prospective single-center evaluation before and after implementation of AXDX in addition to standard-of-care (SOC) microbiology and antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Patients with GNB reported during laboratory working hours and prespecified risk factors for AMR were included. The primary outcome was an ASP-oriented beneficial antimicrobial change, defined as either an escalation of an inappropriate empiric treatment or de-escalation of a broad-spectrum treatment of a susceptible organism. Main secondary outcomes were time to an appropriate treatment, antimicrobial treatment duration, length of stay (LOS) and mortality.ResultsIncluded were 46 and 57 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. The median time to an AST-oriented beneficial change was 29.2 h vs. 49.6 h, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the time to appropriate treatment, LOS or mortality. Antimicrobial treatment duration was longer during the intervention period (10 vs. 8 days, p = 0.007). AXDX failed to correctly identify pathogens in all 6 cases of polymicrobial bacteremia. In two cases patient care was potentially compromised due to inappropriate de-escalation.ConclusionsAXDX implementation resulted in a 20.4-hour shorter time to an ASP-oriented beneficial antimicrobial change. This should be weighed against the higher costs, the lack of other proven clinical benefits and the potential harm from mis-identification of polymicrobial bacteremias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据