4.7 Article

A Comparative Inflammation-On-A-Chip with a Complete 3D Interface: Pharmacological Applications in COPD-Induced Neutrophil Migration

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202301673

关键词

3D printing; chemotaxis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; inflammation-on-a-chip; neutrophil migration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a deadly lung disease with limited drug discovery due to lack of appropriate preclinical models. Researchers have developed a comparative inflammation-on-a-chip (IoC) model that mimics the key feature of COPD, neutrophil transendothelial migration (NTEM). Using this model, the effects of CXCR2 inhibitors on neutrophil migration in the presence of COPD patient samples were evaluated. This IoC model provides a valuable tool for studying COPD severity and advancing research on NTEM.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a slow-progressing inflammatory lung disease that is associated with high mortality and disability. There is a lack of appropriate preclinical models of COPD, which hampers drug discovery efforts. Herein, a comparative inflammation-on-a-chip (IoC) is developed with a complete 3D interface without the formation of any micropillar and phaseguide structures that replicated chemoattractant-induced neutrophil transendothelial migration (NTEM), a key feature of COPD. The IoC model is used to evaluate the pharmacological effects of CXCR2 inhibitors (MK-7123, AZD5069, and SB225002) on the migration of neutrophil-like cells in the presence of plasma samples from patients with COPD. This is the first study to evaluate inhibitors of CXCR2-dependent NTEM in a comparative IoC model that mimics the physiological 3D microenvironment, consisting of an endothelial barrier, extracellular compartment, and inflammatory conditions. This IoC model will be useful to investigate COPD severity using patient samples, and will aid basic and translational research involving NTEM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据