4.7 Article

A Nature-Inspired Versatile Bio-Adhesive

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202301560

关键词

hemostasis; multifunctional biological adhesives; phenolic compounds; polyglutamic acid; tissue repairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a multifunctional hydrogel bio-glue was developed using polyglutamic acid (PGA), tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), and tannic acid (TA) as precursors and DMTMM as condensation agent. This bio-glue showed strong adhesion to various tissues and wet materials, and also exhibited anti-oxidation and hemostasis functions. It demonstrated excellent performance in wound, liver, and cartilage repair, indicating its potential for clinical application. This study opens up a new avenue for the development of multifunctional hydrogel bio-adhesives.
The application of most hydrogel bio-adhesives is greatly limited due to their high swelling, low underwater adhesion, and single function. Herein, a spatial multi-level physical-chemical and bio-inspired in-situ bonding strategy is proposed, to develop a multifunctional hydrogel bio-glue using polyglutamic acid (PGA), tyramine hydrochloride (TYR), and tannic acid (TA) as precursors and 4-(4,6-dimethoxytriazine-2-yl) -4-methylmorpholine hydrochloride(DMTMM) as condensation agent, which is used for tissue adhesion, hemostasis and repair. By introducing TYR and TA into the PGA chain, it is demonstrated that not only can the strong adhesion of bio-glue to the surface of various fresh tissues and wet materials be realized through the synergistic effect of spatial multi-level physical and chemical bonding, but also this glue can be endowed with the functions of anti-oxidation and hemostasis. The excellent performance of such bio-glue in the repair of the wound, liver, and cartilage is achieved, showing a great potential in clinical application for such bio-glue. This study will open up a brand-new avenue for the development of multifunctional hydrogel biological adhesive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据