4.7 Article

Maximizing Heterologous Expression of Engineered Type I Polyketide Synthases: Investigating Codon Optimization Strategies

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 3366-3380

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00367

关键词

codon optimization; online tool; codon usage; type 1 polyketide synthase; heterologous expression; industrial host

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the influence of 11 different codon variants on heterologous expression was analyzed. The best-performing codon variants resulted in a 50-fold increase in protein levels and successful synthesis of unnatural polyketides in different hosts. Additionally, an online tool for codon optimization was developed.
Type I polyketide synthases (T1PKSs) hold enormous potential as a rational production platform for the biosynthesis of specialty chemicals. However, despite great progress in this field, the heterologous expression of PKSs remains a major challenge. One of the first measures to improve heterologous gene expression can be codon optimization. Although controversial, choosing the wrong codon optimization strategy can have detrimental effects on the protein and product levels. In this study, we analyzed 11 different codon variants of an engineered T1PKS and investigated in a systematic approach their influence on heterologous expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas putida. Our best performing codon variants exhibited a minimum 50-fold increase in PKS protein levels, which also enabled the production of an unnatural polyketide in each of these hosts. Furthermore, we developed a free online tool (https://basebuddy.lbl.gov) that offers transparent and highly customizable codon optimization with up-to-date codon usage tables. In this work, we not only highlight the significance of codon optimization but also establish the groundwork for the high-throughput assembly and characterization of PKS pathways in alternative hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据