4.5 Article

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma in Patients with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 E416-E420

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.110

关键词

Neurofibromatosis; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy; Schwannoma; Stereotactic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate whether fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) is more effective than single-dose radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of vestibulocochlear schwannomas in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2). The results showed that in the NF2 population, FRT may yield worse control rates than SRS. Therefore, it is preferable to avoid fractionated treatment for these patients whenever possible.
BACKGROUND: The use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of vestibulocochlear schwannomas is standard in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2). In the general population, fractionated RT (FRT) can achieve good results compared to single-dose radiosurgery (SRS). We aimed to assess whether this is true for NF2 patients as well.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 34 patients and 54 lesions treated between 2010 and 2023 in a single university hospital.RESULTS: Thirty-four patient charts were assessed. The median follow-up was 62.6 months (range, 7.1-135.8 months). Lesion size (median larger diameter, 2.5 cm) was correlated with the use of FRT (P > 0.001). Younger age also was correlated with FRT (P [ 0.006). Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The overall control rate was 76.5%, and the mean PFS was 49.8 months, compared with . 90.5% and 57.2 months, respectively, for SRS and 66.7% and 44.9 months, respectively, for FRT. There were no differences between the 2 groups in hearing loss, tinnitus, and facial palsy.CONCLUSIONS: In the NF2 population, FRT may yield worse control rates than SRS. Whenever possible, it is preferable to not fractionate treatment for these patients.Nevertheless, the FRT results were still good. More and larger prospective trials are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据