4.8 Article

Experimental and Theoretical Evaluations of the Galvanomagnetic Effect in an Individual Bismuth Nanowire

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 110-119

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03592

关键词

Bismuth nanowire; galvanomagnetic effect; Hall effect; magnetoresistance; focused ion beam

资金

  1. JSPS Kakenhi [15E104142]
  2. NIMS Nano-fabrication Platform of the Nanotechnology Platform Project
  3. Nanotechnology Platform - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [12024046]
  4. Thermal and Electric Energy Technology Foundation
  5. Tanigawa Fund Promotion of Thermal Technology
  6. Advanced Research Program for Energy and Environmental Technologies of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan
  7. [26886016]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04142, 15K05120] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The galvanomagnetic effect is evaluated experimentally and theoretically in an individual bismuth nanowire encapsulated within a quartz template. A small section of the side surface of the encapsulated bismuth nanowire is exposed using focused ion beam processing, and a total of six carbon film electrodes are fabricated on the exposed nanowire surface by in situ deposition in order to be able to perform electrical measurements on the nanowire. The results show that the galvanomagnetic effect in the nanowire is affected by carrier collisions at the nanowire boundary; this is particularly the case at low temperatures. The Hall mobilities of electrons and holes are determined based on the measured Hall coefficient and magnetoresistivity values. It is found that the carrier mobility in the bismuth nanowire is lower than that in bulk bismuth and that it plateaus at low temperatures, as predicted by the calculation model used in the study, which takes into account the carrier mean free path limitation imposed by the small diameter of the nanowire.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据