4.8 Article

Nanoscale Chemical Imaging of a Dynamic Molecular Phase Boundary with Ultrahigh Vacuum Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 3898-3904

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01405

关键词

Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS); ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy (UHV-STM); time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT); dynamic molecular phase boundary

资金

  1. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences (SISGR) [DE-FG02-09ER16109]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE-1324585, CHE-1414466, DMR-1121262]
  3. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-1121262]
  4. National Science Foundation Center for Chemical Innovation [CHE-1414466]
  5. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-09ER16109]
  6. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Department of Energy [DE-FG02-99ER14999]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [1414466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoscale chemical imaging of a dynamic molecular phase boundary has broad implications for a range of problems in catalysis, surface science, and molecular electronics. While scanning probe microscopy (SPM) is commonly used to study molecular phase boundaries, its information content can be severely compromised by surface diffusion, irregular packing, or three-dimensional adsorbate geometry. Here, we demonstrate the simultaneous chemical and structural analysis of N-N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1,7-(4'-t-butylphenoxy)perylene-3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (PPDI) molecules by UHV tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Both condensed and diffusing domains of PPDI coexist on Ag(100) at room temperature. Through comparison with time-dependent density functional theory simulations, we unravel the orientation of PPDI molecules at the dynamic molecular domain boundary with unprecedented similar to 4 nm spatial resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据