4.8 Article

Coordination between Intra- and Extracellular Forces Regulates Focal Adhesion Dynamics

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 399-406

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04364

关键词

Mechanobiology; molecular force sensor; focal adhesion; micropillar substrate; rigidity sensing; cell traction force; vinculin

资金

  1. European Research Council
  2. European Union/ERC [617233]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche PillarCell [ANR 13-NANO-0011]
  4. USPC-NUS collaborative program
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-BLAN-1515]
  6. France-BioImaging infrastructure [ANR-10-INBS-04]
  7. French National Research Agency [ANR-10-INBS-04]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-NANO-0011, ANR-10-BLAN-1515] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Focal adhesions (FAs) are important mediators of cell substrate interactions. One of their key functions is the transmission of forces between the intracellular acto-myosin network and the substrate. However, the relationships between cell traction forces, FA architecture, and molecular forces within FAs are poorly understood. Here, by combining Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based molecular force biosensors with micropillar-based traction force sensors and high-resolution fluorescence microscopy, we simultaneously map molecular tension across vinculin, a key protein in FAs, and traction forces at FAs. Our results reveal strong spatiotemporal correlations between vinculin tension and cell traction forces at FAs throughout a wide range of substrate stiffnesses. Furthermore, we find that molecular tension within individual FAs follows a biphasic distribution from the proximal (toward the cell nucleus) to distal end (toward the cell-edge). Using super-resolution imaging, we show that such a distribution relates to that of FA proteins. On the basis of our experimental data, we propose a model in which FA dynamics results from tension changes along the FAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据