4.7 Article

Improved accuracy in colorectal cancer tissue decomposition through refinement of established deep learning solutions

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42357-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized stained biopsy slides to extract CNN-based biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. By refining the training strategy of an established CNN model, the researchers achieved higher accuracy and reduced errors in relevant biomarker classes. This study also introduced interpretability methods to better understand the capabilities and limitations of the model.
Hematoxylin and eosin-stained biopsy slides are regularly available for colorectal cancer patients. These slides are often not used to define objective biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment selection. Standard biomarkers often pertain to costly and slow genetic tests. However, recent work has shown that relevant biomarkers can be extracted from these images using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The CNN-based biomarkers predicted colorectal cancer patient outcomes comparably to gold standards. Extracting CNN-biomarkers is fast, automatic, and of minimal cost. CNN-based biomarkers rely on the ability of CNNs to recognize distinct tissue types from microscope whole slide images. The quality of these biomarkers (coined 'Deep Stroma') depends on the accuracy of CNNs in decomposing all relevant tissue classes. Improving tissue decomposition accuracy is essential for improving the prognostic potential of CNN-biomarkers. In this study, we implemented a novel training strategy to refine an established CNN model, which then surpassed all previous solutions . We obtained a 95.6% average accuracy in the external test set and 99.5% in the internal test set. Our approach reduced errors in biomarker-relevant classes, such as Lymphocytes, and was the first to include interpretability methods. These methods were used to better apprehend our model's limitations and capabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据