4.7 Article

Continuous therapy response references for BCR::ABL1 monitoring in pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45364-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the molecular response kinetics to TKI therapy in 129 pediatric CML patients and investigated the role of response assessment based on continuous references in individual therapy adjustment. The high-resolution response target curve of the optimal responder group proved to be a valuable tool for continuous therapy monitoring of individual pediatric CML patients.
Response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is monitored by quantification of BCR::ABL1 transcript levels. Milestones for assessing optimal treatment response have been defined in adult CML patients and are applied to children and adolescents although it is questionable whether transferability to pediatric patients is appropriate regarding genetic and clinical differences. Therefore, we analyzed the molecular response kinetics to TKI therapy in 129 pediatric CML patients and investigated whether response assessment based on continuous references can support an early individual therapy adjustment. We applied a moving quantiles approach to establish a high-resolution response target curve and contrasted the median responses in all patients with the median of the ideal target curve obtained from a subgroup of optimal responders. The high-resolution response target curve of the optimal responder group presents a valuable tool for continuous therapy monitoring of individual pediatric CML patients in addition to the fixed milestones. By further comparing BCR::ABL1 transcript levels with BCR::ABL1 fusion gene copy numbers, it is also possible to model the differential dynamics of BCR::ABL1 expression and cell number under therapy. The developed methodology can be transferred to other biomarkers for continuous therapy monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据