4.7 Article

Thermodynamical framework for effective mitigation of high aerosol loading in the Indo-Gangetic Plain during winter

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40657-w

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides new mechanistic insight into aerosol mitigation in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) during winter. It suggests that aerosol acidity and aerosol liquid water content play crucial roles in governing the gas-to-particle phase partitioning and mass loading of fine aerosols. Reductions in hydrochloric acid (HCl) and nitrogen dioxide (HNO3) would be the most effective pathway for aerosol mitigation in the IGP.
The Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP) experiences severe air pollution every winter, with ammonium chloride and ammonium nitrate as the major inorganic fractions of fine aerosols. Many past attempts to tackle air pollution in the IGP were inadequate, as they targeted a subset of the primary pollutants in an environment where the majority of the particulate matter burden is secondary in nature. Here, we provide new mechanistic insight into aerosol mitigation by integrating the ISORROPIA-II thermodynamical model with high-resolution simultaneous measurements of precursor gases and aerosols. A mathematical framework is explored to investigate the complex interaction between hydrochloric acid (HCl), nitrogen oxides (NOx), ammonia (NH3), and aerosol liquid water content (ALWC). Aerosol acidity (pH) and ALWC emerge as governing factors that modulate the gas-to-particle phase partitioning and mass loading of fine aerosols. Six sensitivity regimes were defined, where PM1 and PM2.5 fall in the HCl and HNO3 sensitive regime, emphasizing that HCl and HNO3 reductions would be the most effective pathway for aerosol mitigation in the IGP, which is ammonia-rich during winter. This study provides evidence that precursor abatement for aerosol mitigation should not be based on their descending mass concentrations but instead on their sensitivity to high aerosol loading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据