4.7 Article

Effects of repeated sprinting on hamstring shear modulus pattern and knee flexor neuromuscular parameters

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38861-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of a maximum repeated sprint protocol on hamstring shear modulus and knee flexor neuromuscular parameters. The results showed significant decreases in average speed, peak torque, and rate of torque development, as well as an increase in the shear modulus of the biceps femoris long head after the sprint task. These findings provide evidence on the impact of repeated sprinting on muscle performance and activation.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the acute effects of a maximum repeated sprint protocol on (1) hamstring shear modulus and (2) knee flexor neuromuscular parameters such as peak torque (PT) and rate of torque development (RTD). Muscle shear modulus was assessed in 18 healthy males using shear wave elastography at rest and during 30 & DEG; isometric knee flexion at 20% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction, before and after a 10 x 30 m repeated sprint protocol. There was a 9% decrease in average speed between the fastest and slowest sprint (p < 0.001; d = 2.27). A pre-post decrease was observed in PT (p = 0.004; & eta;(2)(p) = 0.399) and in the 0-50 ms (p = 0.042; & eta;(2)(p) = 0.222), and 50-100 ms (p = 0.028; & eta;(2)(p) = 0.254) RTD periods. For the active shear modulus, the only significant change after the sprint task was in the biceps femoris long head (BFlh) with an increase of 10% (Pre: 26.29 & PLUSMN; 8.89 kPa; Post: 28.93 & PLUSMN; 8.31 kPa; p = 0.015; d = 0.31). The present study provides evidence that repeated sprinting leads to significant decreases in average speed, PT, early RTD (0-50 ms; 50-100 ms), and to an increase in BFlh active shear modulus without changing the shear modulus of the other hamstrings muscles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据