4.2 Article

Two new species of resupinate poroid fungi (Basidiomycota, Polyporaceae) from Sao Tome and Principe Archipelago

期刊

PHYTOTAXA
卷 607, 期 1, 页码 41-56

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.607.1.4

关键词

Equatorial Africa; Grammothele; Gulf of Guinea; Megasporia; Molecular phylogeny; Porogramme; Taxonomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new species, Megasporia insularis and Porogramme principes, were identified based on morphological and molecular data from specimens collected on Principe Island. Phylogenetic analyses supported the placement of M. insularis within the redefined Megasporia clade. P. principes was placed in a supported clade sister to P. subargentea, and it is proposed to combine the species G. taiwanensis as Porogramme taiwanensis.
Megasporia insularis and Porogramme principes are described as new species based on morphological and molecular data of specimens collected on the Island of Principe (Sao Tome and Principe Archipelago). Megasporia insularis is characterized by the hymenophore with large regular pores, a di-trimitic hyphal system with strongly dextrinoid skeletal hyphae, apically acuminate hyphal endings at the dissepiments edges, presence of dendrohyphidia, and large, subcylindrical basidiospores. Our phylogenetic analyses of the ITS-nLSU-mtSSU-RPB1-RPB2-TEF regions support the placement of M. insularis within an inclusive clade containing the redefined Megasporia. Porogramme principes has small irregular pores, a dimitic hyphal system with weakly dextrinoid skeletal hyphae, and small, oblong-ellipsoid basidiospores. The phylogenetic analyses of Porogramme and related genera place P. principes, together Grammothele taiwanensis, in a supported clade sister to P. subargentea, and separate from the species clade Grammothele s.str. Therefore, we propose to combine the species G. taiwanensis as Porogramme taiwanensis. Illustrations of these two novel species and updated keys to Megasporia and Porogramme genera are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据