4.7 Article

Effects of Fasting on the Physiological and Psychological Responses in Middle-Aged Men

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15153444

关键词

fasting; men; psychological variables; physiological indicators

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to measure psychological and physiological reactions during 8 days of water-only fasting. The results showed a decrease in body weight, blood pressure, and glucose level, as well as an increase in resting heart rate, cortisol, and β-hydroxybutyrate concentration. However, no significant psychological changes were observed.
Tracking changes in the body during fasting takes into account indicators of mental well-being and physiological parameters. The aim of the study was to measure psychological and physiological reactions, along with their mutual relations, caused by 8 days of water-only fasting. Fourteen men aged 35 to 60 participated in the study, divided into two groups, younger and elder. In addition to physiological parameters, psychological data were collected using four different tests. The obtained results confirmed reduction in body weight, systolic blood pressure, resting diastolic blood pressure and glucose level, and increase in resting heart rate, cortisol and & beta;-hydroxybutyrate concentration. However, no significant psychological changes were observed under the influence of fasting intervention. A significant interaction effect occurred for the state anxiety variable determined before and after the fasting intervention for both groups. Moreover, negative correlations between physiological (cortisol) and psychological factors of subjectively assessed stress were revealed. The only effect on cognitive ability was seen when responding to simple tasks. The study confirmed the beneficial effect of 8 days of water-only fasting on physiological variables without affecting mental well-being. The relatively high level of well-being after fasting intervention was independent of the physiological indicators of stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据