4.7 Article

Using Crowdsourced Food Image Data for Assessing Restaurant Nutrition Environment: A Validation Study

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15194287

关键词

nutrition assessment; food image data; image recognition; crowdsourcing; validation; restaurant; food environment; Hartford; FAFH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crowdsourced online food images, combined with food image recognition technologies, offer a cost-effective solution for assessing restaurant nutrition environments. However, these images are subject to selection bias and may not fully represent the actual nutrition quality or customers' dietary behaviors. Supplementing the food image data with alternative data sources is necessary for a more representative assessment.
Crowdsourced online food images, when combined with food image recognition technologies, have the potential to offer a cost-effective and scalable solution for the assessment of the restaurant nutrition environment. While previous research has explored this approach and validated the accuracy of food image recognition technologies, much remains unknown about the validity of crowdsourced food images as the primary data source for large-scale assessments. In this paper, we collect data from multiple sources and comprehensively examine the validity of using crowdsourced food images for assessing the restaurant nutrition environment in the Greater Hartford region. Our results indicate that while crowdsourced food images are useful in terms of the initial assessment of restaurant nutrition quality and the identification of popular food items, they are subject to selection bias on multiple levels and do not fully represent the restaurant nutrition quality or customers' dietary behaviors. If employed, the food image data must be supplemented with alternative data sources, such as field surveys, store audits, and commercial data, to offer a more representative assessment of the restaurant nutrition environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据