4.7 Article

Methylliberine Ingestion Improves Various Indices of Affect but Not Cognitive Function in Healthy Men and Women

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15214509

关键词

cognitive flexibility; mood; energy; concentration; motivation; nootropics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the acute effects of oral methylliberine supplementation on cognitive function and well-being. The results showed that methylliberine improved concentration, motivation, mood, and well-being, with no significant effects on cognitive function.
This study assessed the acute effects of oral methylliberine (Dynamine (TM)) supplementation on cognitive function and indices of well-being. This was a double-blind, randomized, within-subject crossover trial. In total, 25 healthy men and women (33.5 +/- 10.7 yr, 172.7 +/- 8.6 cm, 73.3 +/- 11.0 kg) underwent pretesting before ingesting methylliberine (100 mg) or a placebo (PLA) for 3 days. On the fourth day, the participants were tested before their fourth dose (baseline) and every hour post-ingestion for 3 h. After a one-week washout period, the participants repeated testing with the alternate investigational product. The testing battery consisted of vitals, Stroop test, Trail Making Test-B, and visual analog scales that assessed various indices of well-being. Mixed factorial ANOVAs with repeated measures were used to assess all variables. There were significant (p <= 0.050) interactions in terms of concentration, motivation, and mood. Methylliberine improved concentration at 1 and 3 h, motivation at 3 h, and mood at 1, 2, and 3 h (p <= 0.050). Methylliberine improved energy, sustained energy, and mood in all participants to a greater extent than PLA at 1 h and 3 h relative to baseline (p <= 0.050). PLA improved motivation at 1 and 2 h and mood at 2 h (p <= 0.050). Methylliberine improved concentration, well-being, and the ability to tolerate stress to a greater extent than PLA at 3 h relative to baseline (p <= 0.050). Women observed elevations in sustained energy at 1 and 3 h (p <= 0.050) with methylliberine vs. PLA. Methylliberine had a negligible influence on cognitive function and vitals (p > 0.050), and no adverse events were reported. Methylliberine significantly improved subjective feelings of energy, concentration, motivation, and mood, but not cognitive function. PLA improved motivation and mood at hours 1 and 2, while methylliberine sustained these benefits for longer. Methylliberine also improved concentration, well-being, and the ability to tolerate stress to a greater degree than PLA, while having no detrimental effects on vital signs. Methylliberine also seemed to have a positive impact on sustained energy in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据