4.7 Article

Prevalence and Characteristics of the Course of Dysphagia in Hospitalized Older Adults

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 15, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15204371

关键词

swallowing disorder; sarcopenia; nutrition; rehabilitation; oral care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, progression, and distinct attributes of sarcopenic dysphagia (SD) in geriatric medicine. The study found that SD was common among older patients and those with SD showed a better recovery rate compared to other types of dysphagia. Patients with SD had compromised nutritional profiles, diminished energy and protein consumption, and extended fasting durations. Thus, an integrated approach in geriatric medicine is crucial for addressing SD.
Sarcopenic dysphagia (SD) is an emerging concern in geriatric medicine. This study aimed to identify the prevalence, progression, and distinct attributes of SD in patients in the Department of Geriatric Medicine. Older adult patients admitted between 2021 and 2022 were enrolled. The department conducts a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) combined with a multidisciplinary team-based intervention, setting the standard for medical care. We diligently assessed the occurrence and development of dysphagia at both the admission and discharge phases. Of the 180 patients analyzed (38.9% male, mean age 86.0 +/- 6.6 years), 22.8% were diagnosed with SD at admission, thrice the rate of other dysphagia variants. Only one patient had new-onset dysphagia during hospitalization, attributed to SD. Patients with SD showed a better recovery rate (18.9%) than those with other dysphagia types. Patients with diminished swallowing capacity had compromised nutritional profiles, diminished energy and protein consumption, and extended fasting durations. Although sarcopenia is a prevalent inducer of dysphagia in older adults, an integrated approach in geriatric medicine involving rehabilitation, nutrition, and dentistry is pivotal. Strategies rooted in CGA promise potential for addressing dysphagia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据