4.6 Article

Genetic Architecture and Functional Implications of the CSF-Contacting Nucleus

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12264-023-01084-z

关键词

Gene architecture; Cerebrospinal fluid-contacting nucleus (CSF-contacting nucleus); Biological function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the gene architecture and potential functions of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-contacting nucleus. The results show that this nucleus contains 19,666 genes, with 913 genes distinct from the non-CSF-contacting dorsal raphe nucleus. The top 40 highly expressed genes are mainly involved in energy metabolism, protein synthesis, transport, secretion, and hydrolysis. The main neurotransmitter is 5-HT, and the receptors for 5-HT and GABA are abundant. Various ion channels and signaling molecules associated with specific pathways were identified. Additionally, important genes related to pain perception and cellular membrane transport were significantly expressed.
We previously identified a unique nucleus, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-contacting nucleus. This study aims to understand its gene architecture and preliminarily suggest its functions. The results showed that there were about 19,666 genes in this nucleus, of which 913 were distinct from the dorsal raphe nucleus (non-CSF contacting). The top 40 highly-expressed genes are mainly related to energy metabolism, protein synthesis, transport, secretion, and hydrolysis. The main neurotransmitter is 5-HT. The receptors of 5-HT and GABA are abundant. The channels for Cl-, Na+, K+, and Ca2+ are routinely expressed. The signaling molecules associated with the CaMK, JAK, and MAPK pathways were identified accurately. In particular, the channels of transient receptor potential associated with nociceptors and the solute carrier superfamily members associated with cell membrane transport were significantly expressed. The relationship between the main genes of the nucleus and life activities is preliminarily verified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据