4.6 Article

Effect of a 3.5% NaCl-10% HCl Corrosive Environment on the Fatigue Behavior of Hot Rolled Aluminum 5083-H111

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16144996

关键词

H11; Al 5083; corrosion; fatigue life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the microstructure, hardness, corrosion behavior, and rotary bending fatigue properties of rolled Al5083-H111 materials. It is the first to investigate the fatigue behavior of corroded Al5083 samples in aggressive corrosion environments. The microstructure of Al5083-H111 consists of grains oriented towards the rolling direction, with various precipitates distributed randomly at the grain boundary. The corrosion resistance of the samples varies in different NaCl and NaCl + HCl solutions, and corroded samples show lower fatigue life compared to non-corroded samples.
This study deals with the microstructure of rolled Al5083-H111 materials, their hardness, corrosion in different solutions, and rotary bending fatigue properties of non-corroded and corroded samples in different solutions. This study is the first to report the fatigue behavior of corroded samples in different aggressive corrosion environments of Al5083. The microstructure of the Al5083-H111 material is in the form of grains oriented towards the rolling direction and it consists of binary Al-Mg, Al-Mn, and Mg-Si; ternary Al-Mg-Si; and quaternary Al-Mn-Fe-Si and Al-Cr-Mn precipitated randomly at the grain boundary. The Brinell hardness of the Al5083-H111 material is 68.67 HB. According to the results of the immersion corrosion, while the sample was more resistant to corrosion in a 3.5% NaCl environment, it showed a less resistant behavior in a 3.5% NaCl + 10% HCl environment. As a result of the fatigue test, it was observed that the sample that did not undergo corrosion showed a higher fatigue life than the samples that were exposed to corrosion. The fatigue rate of the 3.5% NaCl corrosion sample was 3.5 times lower than the fatigue rate of the 3.5% NaCl + 10% HCl corrosion sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据