4.6 Article

Interface Structure, Dielectric Behavior and Temperature Stability of Ba(Mg1/3Ta2/3)O3/PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 Thin Films

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16196358

关键词

BMT/PZT thin films; interface number; dielectric behavior; temperature stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the effects of heterogeneous interfaces on the dielectric behavior and temperature stability of Ba(Mg1/3Ta2/3)O-3/PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 (BMT/PZT) thin films, and finds that the presence of heterogeneous interfaces can improve the film's performance and expand its applications.
Multilayer films can achieve advanced properties and a wide range of applications. The heterogeneous interface plays an important role in the performances of multilayer films. In this paper, the effects of the interface of Ba(Mg1/3Ta2/3)O-3/PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 (BMT/PZT) thin films on dielectric behavior and temperature stability are investigated. The heterogeneous interface structures are characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). The PZT-BMT interface is different from the BMT-PZT interface in thickness. For the PZT-BMT interface, the PZT thin films are diffused to the whole BMT layers, and the interface thickness is about 90 nm, while the BMT-PZT interface's thickness is only about 8.6 nm. The presence of heterogeneous interfaces can improve the performances of BMT/PZT thin films and expand their applications. The dielectric constant of BBPP thin films is significantly lower than BPBP thin films, while the dielectric loss is exactly the opposite. The more interfaces there are, the greater the dielectric constant. The relationship between the electric-field-dependent dielectric constant curve and the P-E curve is established. The equivalent interface barrier of the diode is used to show that the dielectric peaks under the positive and negative voltage are different. Similarly, heterogeneous interfaces show a certain improvement in dielectric tunability and temperature stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据