4.6 Article

New Experimental Evidence for Drying Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Slag with Sodium Hydroxide

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16165659

关键词

drying shrinkage; autogenous shrinkage; alkali-activated materials; creep; microcracking; carbonation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the drying shrinkage behavior of six AAS/sodium hydroxide mortar compositions and the main factors affecting their drying shrinkage. The results show that the shrinkage magnitude is not directly correlated with the molarity of the activating solution, but increases with an increase in the solution-to-binder ratio.
Alkali-activated slag (AAS) is emerging as a possible and more sustainable alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in the construction industry, thanks to its good mechanical and chemical properties. Conversely, the effects of its high drying shrinkage are still a concern for its long-term durability. This study aims to investigate the drying shrinkage behaviour of six AAS/sodium hydroxide mortar compositions and the main phenomena affecting their drying shrinkage behaviour. Specifically, the molarity, solution-to-binder ratio (s/b), autogenous shrinkage, creep compliance, microcracking, and carbonation are considered as possible causes of the differences between AAS and OPC. The results show that it is not possible to correlate the shrinkage magnitude with the molarity of the activating solution, while an increase in the s/b increases the drying shrinkage. Concerning the other factors, autogenous deformation remains significant even after a period of 112 days, while the creep compliance is definitely affected by the drying process but does not seem to affect the shrinkage magnitude. Furthermore, the presence of microcracks caused by the drying process definitely influences the drying shrinkage. Finally, carbonation depends on the molarity of the activating solution, even though its effects on the material are still unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据