4.6 Article

Revealing the Interface Characteristic and Bonding Ability of CoCrFeNi High Entropy Alloy/Al Composite by First-Principles Calculations

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16206692

关键词

first-principle calculation; high entropy alloy composite; interfacial atomic binding evolution; lattice matching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the interfacial atomic bonding and atom-matching structure of Al atoms on the crystal plane of CoCrFeNi HEA were investigated using first-principles calculations. The results showed a strong interface bonding ability of Al atoms and a phase transition with increasing deposited atoms. Additionally, the study revealed the occurrence of electron cloud and charge transfer at the interface.
In this work, the interfacial atomic bonding process and atom-matching structure of Al atoms deposited on the crystal plane of CoCrFeNi HEA were investigated by first-principles calculations. The relevant physical parameters, including crystal structure, lattice constants, chemical bonding, and differential charge distribution, were studied in detail. The results showed that the constructed crystal model of CoCrFeNi HEA has a stable structure, and the binding energy of Al atoms deposited constantly on different crystal planes at different sites is less than -16.21 eV, indicating a strong interface bonding ability. With the increase in deposited atoms, the material is subjected to a phase transition from two-dimensional chemical adsorption of Al atoms in a single layer to three-dimensional chemical binding of the bulk. Furthermore, the electron cloud occurred through the interaction of positive and negative charges at the interface, indicating that the charge has been transferred along with a chemical bond between Al and CoCrFeNi atoms. It can be thought that the interface formed a stable structure and possessed low mismatch stress. This work provides a theoretical basis for designing CoCrFeNi series HEA-reinforced Al matrix composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据