4.5 Article

Differences in epidemiology of candidaemia in the Nordic countries - what is to blame?

期刊

MYCOSES
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 11-19

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12535

关键词

Candidaemia; Nordic countries; prescription practice; antifungal consumption

资金

  1. Astellas
  2. Basilea
  3. Gilead
  4. Merck Sharp Dohme
  5. Pfizer
  6. Novartis
  7. Alexion
  8. BMS
  9. Celgene
  10. Roche
  11. Octapharma
  12. Baxter
  13. Grifols
  14. CSL Behring
  15. Schering-Plough
  16. Janssen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

National data from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden demonstrate remarkable differences in candidaemia epidemiology. Only Denmark has reported a high incidence of 10 per 100 000 inhabitants and a species shift towards increased C. glabrata candidaemias. The reasons for this development remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore possible contributing factors for the differences in Candida epidemiology in the Nordic countries. We used public data from 2011 from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden on epidemiology, demographics, health facilities, predisposing risk factors, consumption of antimicrobial drugs and fungicides in agricultural industry. Only the prevalence of haematological malignancies (P < 0.001) was significantly higher in Denmark compared to the other Nordic countries. The antibacterial drug use of metronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, colistin and carbapenems, and antifungal use of fluconazole in humans (P < 0.001), were significantly higher in Denmark compared to the other Nordic countries (all P < 0.001). Our findings suggest haematological malignancy, the use of certain antibacterial drugs and azoles in humans as possible contributing factors for the differences in Candida epidemiology. However, our results should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of long-term, case-specific data. Further studies are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据