4.6 Article

Low-cost and eco-friendly biosorbent for effective removal of hazardous ions from simulated radioactive liquid waste

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105254

关键词

Biosorbent; Radioactive waste; Kinetics; Isotherm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice bran, as a stable and insoluble material with ionizable functional groups, has been used as a biosorbent to remove hazardous ions from radioactive waste. The experimental results show that rice bran has a high sorption capacity for altered hazardous ions and is effective in treating simulated radioactive waste containing interfering ions.
Rice bran (RB) is distinguished by its chemical stability, insoluble in water, and local availability, in addition to the presence of ionizable functional groups which able to bind with the elements. Hence, this material was preferred to be utilized in this study as an operative biosorbent of altered hazardous ions such as Pb2+, Sr2+, and Eu3+ from simulated radioactive waste to attain a safe environment free from the risk of such waste. The kinetic studies illustrated that the sorption process obeys the pseudo-second-order model. From the isotherm studies, Langmuir is the most applicable isotherm model to the experimental data with monolayer sorption capacities of 1.26, 0.76, and 0.33 mmol/g for Sr2+, Eu3+, and Pb2+, respectively. The efficiency of RB was evaluated by applying it to a simulated radioactive waste containing multicomponent to study the interfering ions. When the sorption capacities of RB and other sorbents were compared, it became clear that RB had a significantly higher sorption capacity than most sorbents. The findings exposed that RB is a material with the potential for the treatment of radioactive waste and can be successfully applied in this regard. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据