4.2 Article

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Cryptocoryneum (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes)

期刊

MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-016-1186-8

关键词

Ascomycota; Hyphomycetes; Lophiotremataceae

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [25440199, 26291084]
  2. Hirosaki University Grant
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26291084, 25440199, 16K07474, 16J07243, 15H04491] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species of Cryptocoryneum were taxonomically reassessed on the basis of morphological observations and the results of molecular phylogenetic analysis. Eighteen isolates of Cryptocoryneum species, namely two strains from Africa, three from Europe, and 13 from Japan, were phylogenetically analysed using sequences of nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the partial sequence of the translation elongation factor 1a gene (TEF1). The phylogenetic analysis indicated that Cryptocoryneum species formed amonophyletic clade and were closely related to Lophiotrema (Lophiotremataceae) and Aquasubmersa (incertae sedis) in the Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes). We examined holotype specimens of C. fasciculatum, C. hysterioides, and Torula uniformis and concluded that these species are conspecific, with C. hysterioides having priority. Although C. hysterioides has long been regarded as a synonymof C. condensatum, we consider C. hysterioides to be a distinct species within the genus. We found several cryptic species that were morphologically similar to C. condensatum sensu lato, but that could be separated on the basis of conidial size andthenumber of conidialarms and conidial septa, characters that seem to be informative for species delimitation within Cryptocoryneum. A total of seven new species, namely C. akitaense, C. brevicondensatum, C. congregatum, C. japonicum, C. longicondensatum, C. paracondensatum, and C. pseudorilstonei, are described and illustrated. A key to species accepted in Cryptocoryneum is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据