4.8 Article

SARS-CoV-2 infection of human lung epithelial cells induces TMPRSS-mediated acute fibrin deposition

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42140-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe COVID-associated lung injury is complicated by a non-classical fibrin clotting mechanism induced by SARS-CoV-2-infected lung epithelial cells, which differs from other susceptible epithelial cells. This viral-induced coagulation mechanism requires thrombin but is independent of tissue factor and other classical plasma coagulation factors. Activation of prothrombin by infection-induced transmembrane serine proteases is involved in this process.
Severe COVID-associated lung injury is a major confounding factor of hospitalizations and death with no effective treatments. Here, we describe a non-classical fibrin clotting mechanism mediated by SARS-CoV-2 infected primary lung but not other susceptible epithelial cells. This infection-induced fibrin formation is observed in all variants of SARS-CoV-2 infections, and requires thrombin but is independent of tissue factor and other classical plasma coagulation factors. While prothrombin and fibrinogen levels are elevated in acute COVID BALF samples, fibrin clotting occurs only with the presence of viral infected but not uninfected lung epithelial cells. We suggest a viral-induced coagulation mechanism, in which prothrombin is activated by infection-induced transmembrane serine proteases, such as ST14 and TMPRSS11D, on NHBE cells. Our finding reveals the inefficiency of current plasma targeted anticoagulation therapy and suggests the need to develop a viral-induced ARDS animal model for treating respiratory airways with thrombin inhibitors. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with extensive diffuse alveolar damage and fibrin formation. Here, Erickson et al describe an infection-induced coagulation mechanism which involves activation of prothrombin by members of TMPRSS genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据