4.8 Article

Programming conformational cooperativity to regulate allosteric protein-oligonucleotide signal transduction

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40589-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a programmable conformational cooperativity strategy to construct an oligo-protein signal transduction platform for logic operations and gene regulations, which can be cooperatively regulated by conformational signals.
Conformational cooperativity is a universal molecular effect mechanism and plays a critical role in signaling pathways. However, it remains a challenge to develop artificial molecular networks regulated by conformational cooperativity, due to the difficulties in programming and controlling multiple structural interactions. Herein, we develop a cooperative strategy by programming multiple conformational signals, rather than chemical signals, to regulate protein-oligonucleotide signal transduction, taking advantage of the programmability of allosteric DNA constructs. We generate a cooperative regulation mechanism, by which increasing the loop lengths at two different structural modules induced the opposite effects manifesting as down- and up-regulation. We implement allosteric logic operations by using two different proteins. Further, in cell culture we demonstrate the feasibility of this strategy to cooperatively regulate gene expression of PLK1 to inhibit tumor cell proliferation, responding to orthogonal protein-signal stimulation. This programmable conformational cooperativity paradigm has potential applications in the related fields. Conformational cooperativity is a universal molecular effect mechanism and plays a critical role in signalling pathways. Here the authors present a programmable conformational cooperativity strategy to construct the oligo-protein signal transduction platform for logic operations and gene regulations which can be cooperatively regulated by conformational signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据