4.8 Article

Development of Plasmodium falciparum liver-stages in hepatocytes derived from human fetal liver organoid cultures

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40298-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have found that hepatocytes derived from human hepatocyte organoids (HepOrgs) can support the development of Plasmodium falciparum, and have identified the importance of the host factor scavenger receptor B1 (SRB1) in parasite development.
Suitable in vitro models allowing to assess Plasmodium liver stage development are still limited. Here, Yang et al. show that hepatocytes derived from human hepatocyte organoids (HepOrgs) can support P. falciparum development. This allowed for the identification and validation of the importance of the host factor, scavenger receptor B1 (SRB1), in parasite development. Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) parasite development in liver represents the initial step of the life-cycle in the human host after a Pf-infected mosquito bite. While an attractive stage for life-cycle interruption, understanding of parasite-hepatocyte interaction is inadequate due to limitations of existing in vitro models. We explore the suitability of hepatocyte organoids (HepOrgs) for Pf-development and show that these cells permitted parasite invasion, differentiation and maturation of different Pf strains. Single-cell messenger RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of Pf-infected HepOrg cells has identified 80 Pf-transcripts upregulated on day 5 post-infection. Transcriptional profile changes are found involving distinct metabolic pathways in hepatocytes with Scavenger Receptor B1 (SR-B1) transcripts highly upregulated. A novel functional involvement in schizont maturation is confirmed in fresh primary hepatocytes. Thus, HepOrgs provide a strong foundation for a versatile in vitro model for Pf liver-stages accommodating basic biological studies and accelerated clinical development of novel tools for malaria control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据