4.1 Article

Vitamin D3 deficiency increases DNA damage and the oxidative burst of neutrophils in a hypertensive rat model

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.01.005

关键词

Cholecalciferol; Comet assay; Oxidative stress; Hypertension; Micronucleus; SHR

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior)
  2. CNPq-Brazil (Conselho Nacional para o Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
  4. FAPESP [2012/04325-9]
  5. CNPq-Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deficiency of vitamin D3, a lipophilic micronutrient, plays a role in the development of some chronic diseases. Vitamin D3 deficiency affects 25-50% of the human population and has been associated with increased risk for development of hypertension. DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) occurs more often in hypertensive than in normotensive individuals, and vitamin D3 status can influence this relationship. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a diet supplemented with (10,000 IU/kg) or deficient in (0 IU/kg) vitamin D3, compared to a vitamin D3 control diet (1000 IU/kg), would modulate DNA damage and ROS production in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and normotensive control Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats after 12 weeks of treatment. ROS production was assessed by measuring the oxidative burst of neutrophils. DNA damage was evaluated using the comet assay in peripheral blood and the micronucleus test in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Vitamin D3 supplementation did not induce DNA damage and did not change neutrophil ROS production in SHR and WKY rats. Vitamin D3 deficiency induced neutrophil ROS production and a high frequency of micronucleus formation in the bone marrow and peripheral blood of SHR rats only, and induced DNA damage (comet) in peripheral blood of both SHR and WKY rats. In conclusion, vitamin D3 deficiency showed a more pronounced effect on hypertensive animals. Population studies are needed to test whether this relationship also exists in humans. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据