Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases

Previous work has sought to understand decision confidence as a prediction of the probability that a decision will be correct, leading to debate over whether these predictions are optimal, and whether they rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This work has generally relied on idealized, low-dimensional models, necessitating strong assumptions about the representations over which confidence is computed. To address this, we used deep neural networks to develop a model of decision confidence that operates directly over high-dimensional, naturalistic stimuli. The model accounts for a number of puzzling dissociations between decisions and confidence, reveals a rational explanation of these dissociations in terms of optimization for the statistics of sensory inputs, and makes the surprising prediction that, despite these dissociations, decisions and confidence depend on a common decision variable. Human decision confidence displays a number of biases and has been shown to dissociate from decision accuracy. Here, by using neural network and Bayesian models, the authors show that these effects can be explained by the statistics of sensory inputs.

Automated summary

Previous work has debated whether predictions of decision confidence are optimal and rely on the same decision variable as decisions themselves. This study used deep neural networks to develop a model of decision confidence that operates on high-dimensional stimuli. The model explains dissociations between decisions and confidence, provides a rational explanation based on the statistics of sensory inputs, and predicts a common decision variable.