4.6 Article

Changes in heme oxygenase level during development affect the adult life of Drosophila melanogaster

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1239101

关键词

neurons; glia; cap'n'collar; survival; behavior; sleep; aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of changes in heme oxygenase (HO) levels in neurons and glial cells on adult Drosophila melanogaster. The results showed that the survival, lifespan, locomotor activity, and sleep of adult flies were influenced by the level of HO, the timing of expression, cell types, sex, and age. HO levels in neurons and glia need to be maintained at an appropriate physiological level during development to ensure the well-being of adults. The downregulation of ho in the brain can be compensated by ho expression in the retina.
Heme oxygenase (HO) has been shown to control various cellular processes in both mammals and Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we investigated how changes in HO levels in neurons and glial cells during development affect adult flies, by using the TARGET Drosophila system to manipulate the expression of the ho gene. The obtained data showed differences in adult survival, maximum lifespan, climbing, locomotor activity, and sleep, which depended on the level of HO (after ho up-regulation or downregulation), the timing of expression (chronic or at specific developmental stages), cell types (neurons or glia), sex (males or females), and age of flies. In addition to ho, the effects of changing the mRNA level of the Drosophila CNC factor gene (NRF2 homolog in mammals and master regulator of HO), were also examined to compare with those observed after changing ho expression. We showed that HO levels in neurons and glia must be maintained at an appropriate physiological level during development to ensure the well-being of adults. We also found that the downregulation of ho in either neurons or glia in the brain is compensated by ho expressed in the retina.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据