4.6 Article

Intra-Patient Genomic Variations of Human Papillomavirus Type 31 in Cervical Cancer and Precancer

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15102104

关键词

human papillomavirus type 31; variant; phylogenetic analysis; APOBEC3

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HPV31 variants are predominantly of lineage B in Japanese women with cervical lesions. Deletions in the viral genome occur in the E1 to L1 genes, but retain the E6/E7 genes. High-frequency nonsynonymous nucleotide variations are found in the E1, E2, and E7 genes in cervical cancer samples, indicating positive selection during cervical cancer/precancer development.
Human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31) is detected less frequently in cervical cancer than two major causative types, HPV16 and HPV18. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of HPV31 genome sequences in cervical lesions collected from Japanese women. Of 52 HPV31-positive cervical specimens analyzed by deep sequencing, 43 samples yielded complete genome sequences of around 7900 base pairs and 9 samples yielded partially deleted genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis showed that HPV31 variant distribution was lineage A in 19 samples (36.5%), lineage B in 28 samples (53.8%), and lineage C in 5 samples (9.6%), indicating that lineage B variants are dominant among HPV31 infections in Japan. Deletions in the viral genome were found in the region from the E1 to L1 genes, but all the deleted genomes retained the E6/E7 genes. Among intra-patient nucleotide variations relative to a consensus genome sequence in each sample, C-to-T substitutions were most frequently detected, followed by T-to-C and C-to-A substitutions. High-frequency, intra-patient mutations (>10%) in cervical cancer samples were found in the E1, E2, and E7 genes, and all of them were nonsynonymous substitutions. The enrichment of high-frequency nonsynonymous substitutions strongly suggests that these intra-patient mutations are positively selected during the development of cervical cancer/precancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据